Legal Opinion

City of Ashland, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Mark Cooper, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant, and Ron Salter, Counter-Defendant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 22, 1988No. 87-3708PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROTT, Circuit Judge:

Mark Cooper was sued in state court by the City of Ashland for damages arising from an alleged breach of contract. At that time, Cooper had pending in federal court a civil rights action against the City and other defendants. Cooper filed a petition in forma pauperis to remove the state court action to federal district court. He also petitioned to proceed without posting a removal bond as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1446(d). The district court granted Coo per indigent status under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), but denied his petition to remove without posting the requisite bond. This…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. United States v. Louisiana-Pacific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. Solutions Exchange, Inc. (In Re Lindsey)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1995
  2. Hawaii v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API