Legal Opinion

C. J. Farley & Co. v. Stoll

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1930No. Docket No. 59, Calendar No. 34,660PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

This suit was brought to recover on defendant’s personal indorsement of two promissory notes, executed to plaintiff by Specialty Dry Goods Shoppe, of which defendant was then a partner. Defendant pleaded release by composition in bankruptcy, and had directed verdict. The question is on the character and effect of the composition.

The bankruptcy proceeding was on involuntary petition against both the partnership and the individual partners. By stipulations and order of court, proceedings were stayed from time to time “for the purpose of permitting Earl D. Stoll to'make an offer of composition…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cumberland Glass Manufacturing Co. v. De Witt & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Myers v. International Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Nassau Smelting & Refining Works, Ltd. v. Brightwood Bronze Foundry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Abbott v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  5. In re Berler Shoe Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schram v. PerkinsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1941
  2. Schram v. WrubelDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API