Conrad v. Atkins
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Chief Judge.
Appellant-petitioner Brett Conrad1 appeals from the trial court’s order that, among other things, appointed appellees-cross-petitioners Thomas and Jeanne Atkins (collectively, the Atkinses) as co-guardians of Patrick Atkins and Patrick’s estate. Specifically, Brett raises the following arguments: (1) Brett should have been appointed as Patrick’s guardian or, at a minimum, should have visitation rights; (2) the trial court erred by declining to require Patrick’s physical attendance at trial and refusing to interview or meet with Patrick; (3) Patrick’s Charles Schwab…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Marriage of J.M. v. N.M.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- V.S.D. v. Williams-HustonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Cunningham v. HastingsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Guardianship of PhillipsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- In re the Guardianship of Hellen Kinney Morris: Mary M. Kinney and Patrick Kinney v. Paul Kevin KinneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- D.R. v. Carey Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Hudson v. ShoemakerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Guardianship of Sharon Izzo v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.