Legal Opinion

Uihlein v. Rosenberg

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1949PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

The defendant Lavo Company demurred to the. amended complaint as amended on two grounds, to-wit: (1) Misjoinder of causes of action,; (2), failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The defendants Louis Rosenberg and Rose Manor Realty Company demurred separately upon the same grounds.

The defendants contend that the five alleged fraudulent transfers described above are five separate and distinct causes of a.ction, each of which affects some of the defendants but that none of them affects all of the defendants, and that .this results in a misjoinder of causes of action.

Th…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zinc Carbonate Co. v. First National Bank of ShullsburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Gager v. MarsdenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Herman v. FelthousenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Adkins v. LoucksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  5. v. Northern Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clark v. CorbyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Libowitz v. Lake Nursing Home, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Wills v. ReganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Libowitz v. Lake Nursing Home, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Richard J. Malouf, D.D.S. v. the State of Texas Ex Rels. Christine Ellis, D.D.S. and Madelayne CastilloTexas Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API