Legal Opinion

Richard J. Malouf, D.D.S. v. the State of Texas Ex Rels. Christine Ellis, D.D.S. and Madelayne Castillo

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 2024No. 22-1046Published

1Opinion of the Court

Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 22-1046 ══════════ Richard J. Malouf, D.D.S., Petitioner, v. The State of Texas ex rels. Christine Ellis, D.D.S. and Madelayne Castillo, Respondents ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Eighth District of Texas ═══════════════════════════════════════ JUSTICE YOUNG, joined by Justice Lehrmann, dissenting. What do robots and lawyers have in common? Maybe more than we would care to admit, but at least one answer is that only robots and lawyers could read the statute at issue the way the Court does…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Muscarello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Texas Department of Transportation v. City of Sunset ValleyTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Deal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API