Brumley v. Pfizer, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JACK, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant Pfizer, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the Court grants the motion.
I. JURISDICTION
This Court has diversity jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
II. FACTS
This is a product liability action involving Viagra (sildenafil citrate), an oral prescription medication manufactured by Pfizer for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). (Motion for Summary Judgment at page 1). On May 15, 1998, Decedent Earnest Brumley died of cardiac…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- El Chico Corp. v. PooleTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Wallace v. Texas Tech Univ.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Alm v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gerber v. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2005
- In Re Rezulin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Myers Ex Rel. Myers v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Long v. Pacific Women's Center LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
- Long v. Pacific Women's Center, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020