Legal Opinion

Accord v. Anderson County, Tennessee

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided March 1, 2022No. 3:21-cv-00077Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION GARY ACCORD, individually and on ) behalf of all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) NO. 3:21-cv-00077 ) JUDGE RICHARDSON v. ) ) ANDERSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE, et ) al. ) ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is Defendant Cocke County’s “Motion to Dismiss” (Doc. No. 117, “Motion”), and accompanying Memorandum of Law. (Doc. No. 118). Plaintiff filed a response (Doc. No. 132), and Defendant filed a reply. (Doc. No. 138). The Motion is ripe for review. For the reasons…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API