Legal Opinion

United States v. Marthinson

District Court, E.D. South Carolina

Decided November 28, 1893PublishedCited by 7 opinions

At Law. Indictment of Charles Marthinson for obstructing a navigable stream. On motion to instruct the jury to find defendant not guilty.

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONTON, District Judge.

This indictmeut is brought under the sixth section of the act of congress approved September 19,1890, entitled “An act making appropriations for the construction, repair, and preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors,’’ (1 Supp. Rev. St. 801.) The evidence in the case is that the defendant is a dealer in timber on the G-reat Pedee river, in South Carolina, a navigable water of the United States; that he made up his rafts in the upper part of the river, and floated them down the stream to market; that in several instances the rafts so made up were seen…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Donald E. Powers v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. McKie Lighter Co., Inc., Donald E. Powers v. McKie Lighter Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. Moran Towing & Transportation Company, Incorporated, United States of America v. Bethlehem Steel CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  3. United States v. Kennebec Log Driving CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
  4. The MaryDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1903
  5. The Libby MaineDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API