Legal Opinion

United States v. Kennebec Log Driving Company

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 19, 1973No. 73-1163PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COFFIN, Chief Judge.

Defendant Kennebec Log Driving Company' is in the business of driving pulp logs down the Kennebec River to paper mills downstream. Defendants Scott Paper Company and Hudson Pulp and Paper Corporation have in the past engaged Kennebec Log Driving Company to perform this service for them, although at the present time only Scott Paper Company continues to do so. 1 The United States claims that this activity violates two provisions of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 in that the floating of masses of logs and the erection and maintenance of booms to guide and collect these…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Illinois v. City of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. Republic Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United States v. Pennsylvania Industrial Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. New Jersey v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. San Juan Bay MarinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. Rohm & Haas Company and Rohm & Haas of Texas, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  4. Com. of Puerto Rico v. SS Zoe ColocotroniDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1978
  5. United States v. LambertDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API