Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 7, 1964No. 22440PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Presiding Justice.

The sole assignment of error in the bill of exceptions is on a judgment denying a motion for a new trial “on each and every ground.” The motion for a new trial was filed to a judgment of the trial judge denying a motion to modify an alimony decree. “A motion for a new trial goes only to the verdict and reaches only such errors of law and fact as contributed to the rendition of the verdict; and therefore errors committed by the court in the rendition of a decree or judgment can not be reached by a motion for a new trial.” Herz v. Claflin Co., 101 Ga. 615 (5) (29 SE 33);…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sweetman v. OwensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  2. Herz v. Claflin Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. Smith v. WoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  4. Ballard v. HarmonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  5. Moreland v. StephensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Insurance Company of North America v. EuniceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API