Callanan v. Port Huron & Northwestern Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Clair. (Stevens, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in head-note 2.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.
In this case a jury was, without objection, sworn to try the cause on the merits ; and, having heard the plaintiff’s ease, the defendant, under a notice in bar puis darrein continuance, was allowed to show an agreement to arbitrate the matter in dispute, and enter judgment on the award when rendered, under which no steps were taken to complete an award. The court held that this put an end to the suit, and so the jury found. Plaintiff brings error.
There is, so far as we have discovered, no authority in favor of treating such a defense as one which can be introduced in bar upon a trial on the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bean v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1822
- Wells v. LaneCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1835
- Larkin v. RobbinsNew York Supreme Court · 1829
- McGunn. v. HanlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Harlow v. Marquette, Houghton & Ontonagon RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Nurney v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Brice v. StarrWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Lawver v. Globe Mut. Ins.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Feather v. HusteadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- United States v. SchneiderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.