Morrow v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
JORDAN, District Judge.
The court tried this civil action without a jury on September 23, 1996. Before the trial, the court considered and denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and then treated the evidentiary material submitted in support of and in opposition to this motion for summary judgment as part of the record at trial. After the trial, the court allowed the parties some time within which to negotiate a settlement of the case, but the parties have been unable to agree. The court therefore issues these findings of fact and conclusions…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bedell v. H.R.C. Ltd.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1981
- Lowe v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
- Carnegie Realty Co. v. Carolina, C. & O. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1916
- Farrar v. N. C. & St. L. Ry.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1931
- Southern Ry. Co v. VannTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.