Nicholson v. Wittig
Court of Appeals of Texas
1DissentO’Connor, Justice
The majority holds that any communication made to a cleric is privileged. I disagree.
In the underlying suit, a medical malpractice case, the Schnepels (Plaintiffs) allege that Heidi Nicholson, M.D., and Edward M. Stephens, M.D. (Defendants), were negligent in delaying the treatment of Mr. Schnepel in that they failed to timely call a surgeon, which delay caused Mr. Schne-pel’s premature death.
During discovery, the Plaintiffs noticed the deposition of Rev. Shirl, the chaplain employed by Memorial Northwest Hospital (Hospital). The Hospital is not a party to this mandamus, but is a party in the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Ginsberg v. Fifth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Giffin v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- United States v. Richard J. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.