Legal Opinion

Hardee County v. R. E. Crummer & Co.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided July 15, 1943Published

1Opinion of the Court

BARKER, District Judge.

Order.

This cause came on to be heard on July 7, 1943 on motion of the defendant to dismiss the amended complaint, and the matter was argued by counsel for the respective parties. It appears to the court (1) that the amended complaint falls directly within the scope of the cases as condemned in Taylor v. Williams, 142 Fla. 402, 195 So. 175, Howey & Co. v. Williams, 142 Fla. 415, 195 So. 181, 183; City of Vero Beach v. Rittenoure, 10 Cir., 113 F.2d 269, and Bradford County v. Nuveen, 5 Cir., 133 F.2d 169; (2) that the contract on which this action is based imposes no duty…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  2. W. J. Howey Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  3. City of Vero Beach v. Rittenoure Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  4. Bradford County v. NuveenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API