Legal Opinion

Bradford County v. Nuveen

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 27, 1943No. 10348PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

The appellees John Nuveen and John Nuveen, Jr., sued Bradford County to recover compensation due them as “refunding agent” under a contract with the county made August 20, 1934, and supplemented December 3, 1934, to refund its bonded indebtedness, claiming two percent of the par amount of $897,000, less $5,712 paid. By amendment a like amount was also claimed on a quantum meruit for work done and services performed. The defenses were that the contract was illegal, that payment under it was to be made only from savings made within three years by buying up the bonds below…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Nuveen v. GreerSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  2. Taylor v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  3. Taylor v. Williams, W. J. Howey Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  4. W. J. Howey Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  5. State v. City of Fort MyersSupreme Court of Florida · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Okeechobee County v. NuveenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  2. Estate of Ballard v. Clay CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  3. Meredith v. City of Winter HavenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  4. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1983
  5. Hardee County v. R. E. Crummer & Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API