Legal Opinion

Cahill v. State

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided January 30, 1980PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALICK, Judge.

These are appeals by the putative fathers. of illegitimate children from support orders entered by the Family Court in civil enforcement proceedings under Title 13, Chapter 5, Subchapter II. 59 Del.Laws c. 567 (1974). The Supreme Court has recently held that the normal civil burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence applies in these proceedings. G. L. v. S. D., Del. Supr., 403 A.2d 1121 (1979). Two issues are raised here: (1) whether the appeals should go directly to the Supreme Court and (2) whether there is a constitutional right to a jury trial of the issue of…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Pernell v. Southall RealtySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. People v. One 1941 Chevrolet CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Byers & Davis v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LoboMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Hoyle v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  3. State v. CahillSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API