Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State Ex Rel. Williams v. Mauer

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 16, 1986No. 68107Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRendlen, Judge

Although laudably concerned with the needs of the circuit courts in dealing with “the exceptional problems which are the hallmark of complex litigation,” the principal opinion, in its zeal to uphold respondent’s “order,”1 unfortunately confers upon inferior courts far greater authority than permissible under the Constitution or our Rules of Civil Procedure, impedes access to the courts, and overly restricts rela-tors’ standing.

Relators have standing to challenge Paragraph 12(a) of respondent’s “order” as well as the discovery provisions of the “order.” Harrison v. Monroe County, 716 S.W.2d…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strahler v. St. Luke's HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  2. State Ex Rel. Cardinal Glennon Memorial Hospital for Children v. GaertnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  3. Harrison v. Monroe CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  4. Douglas v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  5. State Ex Rel. Gray v. JensenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API