Legal Opinion

Kanovitz v. Bloodgood

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 20, 1972No. Civ. 39309PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROTH, P. J.

Appellant, a state certified official court reporter, raises a single issue on the basis of uncontroverted facts: Is the provision of Penal Code, section 869 requiring a court reporter to furnish a copy of a felony preliminary hearing “without charge” to the county valid and enforceable?

In the case at bench, appellant reported and caused to be transcribed the record of a preliminary hearing held in the municipal court; certified and delivered the record and copies thereof in a timely and lawful manner; and then presented the Auditor-Controller of Los Angeles County with an…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Sail'er Inn, Inc. v. KirbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Brown-Forman Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. County of San Diego v. MilotzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Crane v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Restate of SwetmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. Corcoran v. CushingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API