Legal Opinion
United States v. Gold Mountain Coffee, Ltd.
United States Court of International Trade
Decided December 19, 1984No. Court 84-6-00858PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion, and Order
RESTANI, Judge:
Plaintiff, the United States of America, brings this action for penalties and forfeitures 1 alleging that defendants Gold Mountain Coffee, Ltd., Gold Mountain Holdings, Ltd., and Teck Hock and Company, Ltd. made false statements in connection with the importation of coffee beans labeled as originating in the Peoples’ Republic of China. Defendants counterclaim, inter alia, for damages alleging improper detention and seizure of the coffee beans. Plaintiff seeks partial summary judgment dismissing the counterclaims based on lack of jurisdiction and the doctrine…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Kosak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wallace G. Frederick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF JACKSON, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Gold Mountain Coffee, Ltd.United States Court of International Trade · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Atlas Minerals and Chemicals, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- United States v. Menard, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 1992
- United States v. Bonneau Co.United States Court of International Trade · 1988
- United States v. Lexjet, LLCUnited States Court of International Trade · 2026