People v. Howard
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that he was denied effective assistance of counsel based upon counsel’s failure, in moving for suppression of defendant’s *1001statement and physical evidence seized by the police, to challenge the legality of defendant’s arrest pursuant to Payton v New York (445 US 573). Defendant has not met his burden of demonstrating "the absence of strategic or other legitimate explanations for counsel’s failure to pursue” the Payton issue (People v Garcia, 75 NY2d 973, 974).
After defendant gave an equivocal response when asked…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. GarciaNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. WatermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. HerzogAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. SimmonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. MurrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998