Legal Opinion

People v. Howard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that he was denied effective assistance of counsel based upon counsel’s failure, in moving for suppression of defendant’s *1001statement and physical evidence seized by the police, to challenge the legality of defendant’s arrest pursuant to Payton v New York (445 US 573). Defendant has not met his burden of demonstrating "the absence of strategic or other legitimate explanations for counsel’s failure to pursue” the Payton issue (People v Garcia, 75 NY2d 973, 974).

After defendant gave an equivocal response when asked…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. People v. GarciaNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. People v. WatermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. People v. HerzogAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. SimmonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. People v. MurrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API