Legal Opinion

Maloney v. King

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1901No. 1,584PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from, District Court, Silver Bow County; William Clancy, Judge. Action by James E. Maloney and. others against Silas E. King and Wakeman Sutton, impleaded with Marcus Daly and others. From an order granting an interlocutory injunction, defendants King and Sutton appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pigott

This is an appeal by the defendants King and Sutton from an order granting an interlocutory injunction.

The Plymouth lode mining claim is owned by the plaintiffs. Title to the Silver King lode mining claim is in the defendants Daly, Murray, and King. The Plymouth adjoins the Silver King on the south. The plaintiffs commenced an action against the defendants by which they seek to- recover a judgment for $150,000, the 'Value of ores alleged to have been mined, extracted and converted by the defendants from the Plymouth claim, and to obtain an injunction restraining them from entering upon that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Parrot Silver & Copper Co. v. HeinzeMontana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Boyd v. DesrozierMontana Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. King v. Pony Gold Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Maloney v. KingMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Colusa Parrot Mining & Smelting Co. v. BarnardMontana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Ringling v. MahurinMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Craver v. StappMontana Supreme Court · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API