Legal Opinion
Fitch v. Public Utility Commission
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 16, 2008No. 07-50088UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
Affordable Telecom (“Affordable”) appeals from the district court’s order af firming the Texas Public Utility Commission’s (“PUCT”) approval of an arbitrated interconnection agreement between Affordable and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (hereinafter “AT & T Texas”). We affirm.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In 2002, Affordable, a small telecommunications company that provides paging service and Internet access, received commercial mobile radio service (“CMRS”) licenses from the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) to provide interconnected common carrier paging…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hidden Oaks Limited, Hidden Oaks Limited, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. The City of Austin, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utility Commission of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Natalia Flores v. Cameron County, Texas, Cameron County, Texas, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- GTE South, Inc. v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. FitchDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
- Jones v. Norfolk Southern Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. FitchDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
- Worldnet Telecommunications, Inc. v. Telecommunications Regulatory BoardDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2009