Legal Opinion
May Tire & Service, Inc. v. Sinclair Refining Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided March 11, 1942PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
The respondent opposed the allowing of appellant’s offset claiming that, (1) the guaranty agreement was ultra vires; (2) was not properly executed; and (3) there was no adequate consideration therefor.' Respondent leased its premises, the only real estate owned by it, to appellant by written lease containing the following stipulations :
“For each month during the term hereof lessee shall yield and pay as rental . . . the sum of $250 per month, . . . provided, however, that lessor shall have the option at the end of each month during the life of this lease of accepting ... a sum equal to one…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Curtis Land & Loan Co. v. Interior Land Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- Winterfield v. Cream City of Brewing CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- State ex rel. Kropf v. GilbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- International Textbook Co. v. MabbottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- Bullen v. Milwaukee Trading Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lyons v. Menominee Enterprises, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- United States v. Bob Chrislaw, Inc., Rockwood & Co., Third-Party v. Ethel Chrislaw, Fourth-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965