Legal Opinion

May Tire & Service, Inc. v. Sinclair Refining Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1942PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The respondent opposed the allowing of appellant’s offset claiming that, (1) the guaranty agreement was ultra vires; (2) was not properly executed; and (3) there was no adequate consideration therefor.' Respondent leased its premises, the only real estate owned by it, to appellant by written lease containing the following stipulations :

“For each month during the term hereof lessee shall yield and pay as rental . . . the sum of $250 per month, . . . provided, however, that lessor shall have the option at the end of each month during the life of this lease of accepting ... a sum equal to one…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Curtis Land & Loan Co. v. Interior Land Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Winterfield v. Cream City of Brewing CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  3. State ex rel. Kropf v. GilbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  4. International Textbook Co. v. MabbottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Bullen v. Milwaukee Trading Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lyons v. Menominee Enterprises, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. United States v. Bob Chrislaw, Inc., Rockwood & Co., Third-Party v. Ethel Chrislaw, Fourth-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API