Legal Opinion

Lyons v. Menominee Enterprises, Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1975No. 394PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

The plaintiffs moved for summary judgment. The trial court denied their motion. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in thus denying such motion.

Summary judgment is a drastic remedy, and a motion for summary judgment is not a substitute for demurrer or judgment on the pleadings. The summary judgment statute 2 vests discretion in the trial court as to whether the case should be tried. 3 The limits of such trial court discretion are not narrow. 4 Where the material facts are in dispute or permit inconsistent inferences as to necessary ultimate facts, summary…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Curtis Land & Loan Co. v. Interior Land Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Commercial Discount Corp. v. Milwaukee Western BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Zimmer v. DaunWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Eastman v. ParkinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  5. St. Clair v. RutledgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Strasser v. Transtech Mobile Fleet Service, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Einhorn v. CuleaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  3. R.C.R. Corp. v. Bank of Middleton (In re R.C.R. Corp.)District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1986
  4. Matter of RCR Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1986
  5. Strasser v. Transtech Mobile Fleet Service, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API