Legal Opinion

Partem v. United States of America

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 29, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2022-3729Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA VERA PARTEM, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 22-3729 (JDB) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ANTONY J. BLINKEN, in his official capacity as Secretary of State, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is defendants United States of America and Antony Blinken’s partial motion to dismiss plaintiff Vera Partem’s complaint. For the reasons explained below, the Court will grant defendants’ motion and dismiss Count III of plaintiff’s complaint. Background The following facts are drawn from the complaint. Plaintiff Vera Partem was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  4. Hutchins, Tiana v. DCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
  5. Conservation Force v. JewellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API