Victor Manuel Ruiz and Antonio Rodriguez v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellants Ruiz and Rodriguez were convicted by a jury for having passed counterfeit United States securities with intent to defraud in violation of Sections 472 and 2 of Title 18, U.S.C. 1 The only substantial question presented by this appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence from which a jury could properly infer guilty knowledge of the counterfeit nature of the bills, such knowledge being an element of the crime charged. 2 The verdict of the jury must be sustained if supported by substantial evidence, including reasonable inferences drawn therefrom, as viewed in the light most…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Marson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- United States v. James Lawrence RelefordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
- Carrullo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Carl Roberts and Barbara Bookout v. United States of America, John Cocco v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Davida Ross Staller and David Owen SaundersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Samuel Robert Sink and John Edward Grim, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. William Sheiner and Victor Piacentile, A/K/A Victor PeaseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Loren Robie WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.