Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Prescott

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 26, 1923No. 11240Published

1Dissent

I concur in the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Watts and wish to add a few observations of my own in support of his conclusion.

I think that the constitutional guaranty of immunity from unreasonable searches and seizures conferred by Article 1 § 16, of our Constitution — "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated" — extends not only to the fact of search and seizure, but to every incident of such unlawful act. To hold that the citizen shall enjoy such immunity, and yet when it is…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Amos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. People v. MayenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API