Legal Opinion

State v. Ourso

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 1, 2011No. 10-1133PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMY, Judge.

I,As part of a plea agreement, the defendant pleaded guilty to possession of cocaine with intent to distribute and possession of methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) with intent to distribute. The defendant was sentenced to twenty years on each count. The trial court ordered the sentences to run concurrently and to run concurrently with the defendant’s sentence in another case. The defendant appeals his sentences. On appeal, defense counsel seeks to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). For the following reasons, we affirm…

2Cases cited7 opinions

Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
State v. CrosbySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
State v. BenjaminLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
State v. WashingtonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

Hernandez v. HernandezLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
State v. ParkerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
State v. OursoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
State of Louisiana v. Herbert William ParkerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
State of Louisiana v. O'Shay Devan HicksLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020