Legal Opinion

State Farm Insurance v. Amana Refrigeration, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1999PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In a subrogation action to recover damages for injury to property, the defendants appeal (1), as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Silverman, J.), entered March 5, 1998, as denied the motion of the defendant Amana Refrigeration, Inc., in which the defendant Sears, Roebuck and Company joined, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint or, in the alternative, dismissing the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3126 or precluding the introduction of expert testimony at trial, and (2) from a judgment of the same court (Cowhey, J.), entered…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Szczerbiak v. PilatNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Kirkland v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Prestia v. MathurAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Quackenbush v. Gar-Ben AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Fada Industries, Inc. v. Falchi Building Co.New York Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Shoecraft v. BBS Automotive Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Dhanessur v. Bugia, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API