Legal Opinion

Rehkamp v. Klahr

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided July 8, 1949No. File 76106Published

1Opinion of the CourtMellitz, J.

There is no substantial dispute that the defendant failed to carry out his agreement to convey to the plaintiffs the real estate involved in the agreement entered into between the parties. The only question is whether the agreement was sufficiently certain to be enforced.

The agreement provides for a purchase money mortgage in the amount of $13,000, to be held by the defendant at 5 per cent interest but does not specify when the mortgage is to be payable. It is settled that where a written agreement for the sale of land provides that a portion of the purchase price is to be secured by a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gray v. GreenblattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  2. O'Sullivan v. OvertonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887
  3. Sullivan v. LaddenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  4. Lipkowitz v. FreedmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  5. McDermott v. DrummSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API