Legal Opinion

Ney v. Zimmerman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 30, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, J.:

This action is brought to recover against the defendants for failure to deposit kronen in a Hungarian bank. There are two causes of action alleged, and there is but a single question of law involved. The defendants set up that there is a cause of action pending involving the same subject-matter, and also that a judgment has been rendered in favor of the defendants in another action brought upon the same cause of action. The facts appearing, upon motion the complaint was dismissed as barred by this prior judgment.

There is no proof of any other pending action. The only question…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stowell v. . ChamberlainNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Marsh v. . MastertonNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Belden v. . the StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. Gall v. GallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  5. Walar v. RechnitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Litkind v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  2. Wagner v. Savage, as Adm'rOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Bassis v. RutenbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Abramson v. GradyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API