Legal Opinion

United Shoe Workers of America v. Brooks Shoe Manufacturing Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 22, 1960No. Civ. A. 24049PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD, District Judge.

On May 2, 1960, 183 F.Supp. 568, we adopted findings of fact and conclusions of law, wherein we found that the defendant, Brooks Shoe Manufacturing Company, discontinued its manufacturing operations in Philadelphia and moved to Hanover, Pennsylvania, in a deliberate scheme to avoid employing unionized labor and in violation of its existing contract with the plaintiff-union. We reserved our decision with respect to the union’s remedy until disposing of the defendants’ motion to dismiss as to the individual plaintiffs. Having granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United Mine Workers of America v. Meadow Creek Coal Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
  4. United Mine Workers of America v. PattonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
  5. United Shoe Workers of America v. Brooks Shoe Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Local 127, United Shoe Workers of America v. Brooks Shoe Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
  2. Local 127, United Shoe Workers Of America, Afl-Cio v. Brooks Shoe Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
  3. Thompson v. Brotherhood of Sleeping Car PortersDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1965
  4. Giordano v. MacK Trucks, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1962
  5. St. Louis Mailers' Union Local No. 3 v. Globe-Democrat Publishing Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API