State v. McNamara
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
Defendant, the manager of an adult bookstore in Eugene, was indicted in a single-count indictment of the crime of selling four allegedly pornographic magazines.① Oregon Laws 1973, ch 699. Following a jury trial defendant was convicted as charged. He appeals citing four alleged errors of the trial court. Two of these concern the constitutionality of Oregon Laws 1973, ch 699, under both the United States and Oregon Constitutions. These precise contentions were considered and rejected by this court in Film Follies, Inc. v. Haas, 22 Or App 365, 369, 539 P2d 669, 671, Sup Ct review denied (1975),…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Street v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Eaton v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. WelchOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Film Follies, Inc. v. HaasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- State v. LibbeyOregon Supreme Court · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- State v. McNamaraOregon Supreme Court · 1976