Legal Opinion

Simoneau v. Town of Enfield

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 30, 1972No. 6410PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C.J.

The issue in this case is whether a tort action for injury on a town bridge (RSA 247:17) can be maintained where the plaintiff failed to file his claim within 10 days as required by RSA 247:25 and then failed to comply with a 60-day extension of time granted by the court (RSA 247:26, 27) in view of the provisions of RSA 247:28. This later statute in pertinent part reads as follows: “RSA 247:28 Limitation of Action. No action against a town for such damages shall be sustained unless a statement is filed as required by sections 25 or 27 hereof.... ”

The plaintiffs claim arises out of an accident…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mildred M. Gossler & A. v. ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966
  2. Prichard v. BoscawenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1916
  3. Stott v. ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1968
  4. Gitchell v. AndoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1879
  5. Sargent v. GilfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bancroft v. Town of CanterburySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  2. Farwell v. Town of BrooklineDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API