Legal Opinion

Mildred M. Gossler & A. v. Manchester

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 15, 1966No. 5470PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

These are actions in case for personal injuries brought by Mildred M. Gossler against the city of Manchester, arising out of injuries sustained when she fell on a city sidewalk. Her husband Harry A. Gossler brings an action for consequential damages.

The defendant filed a motion to dismiss both actions as a matter of law on the grounds that maintenance of a highway is a governmental function on its part in the performance of which there can be no liability. The motions were granted and all questions of law raised thereby were reserved and transferred by Grimes, J.

The plaintiff concedes that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Hargrove v. Town of Cocoa BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  4. Spanel v. Mounds View School District No. 621Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  5. Mower v. Inhabitants of LeicesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1812

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Merrill v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  2. Sambs v. City of BrookfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Estate of Cargill v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  4. Conway v. HumbertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Sousa v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API