Legal Opinion
In re O'Toole
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 4, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent Thomas O’Toole was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on February 29, 1988. Respondent currently maintains an office for the practice of law in Baltimore, Maryland and the Departmental Disciplinary Committee believes that he has not practiced law in New York since 1990 and no longer maintains an office in this state.
The Committee presently petitions this Court for an order pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.3, suspending respondent for 30 days predicated upon the fact that he was similarly disciplined in the State of…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. O'TooleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- In re VohraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re LillardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re LaSalleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re BieluchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
4Cited by2 opinions
- In re KahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re JaffeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007