Legal Opinion

Marvel v. Regienus

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 6, 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

This is an action of tort to recover damages for cutting and carrying away wood from the plaintiff’s land in Hardwick. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 242, § 7. See Davenport v. Haskell, 293 Mass. 454; Moskow v. Smith, 318 Mass. 76. The case was referred to an auditor, whose findings of fact, by stipulation of the parties, were to be final. A judge of the Superior Court, on motion of the plaintiff, ordered judgment to be entered for him on the auditor’s report. The case comes to us on the defendant’s exceptions to the allowance of this motion, to the denial of the defendant’s motion for judgment, and to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Howland v. StoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Temple v. BensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Davenport v. HaskellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. Harper v. PoundIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Gray v. KelleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. White v. HartiganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  2. Bailey v. LookSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. Smaland Beach Association, Inc. v. GenovaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API