Legal Opinion

Aimee L. Spalding v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided June 18, 2026No. 3:24-cv-00714Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION AIMEE L. SPALDING Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 3:24-cv-714-RGJ FRANK BISIGNANO Defendant * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Plaintiff Aimee L. Spalding (“Spalding”) filed a motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) of the Social Security Act. [DE 21]. Defendant Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”), did not oppose the motion. [DE 23]. Spalding also filed notice of the unopposed motion. [DE 24]. This matter is ripe. For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Rodriquez v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  3. Edna L. HAYES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  4. Patrick Lasley v. Comm'r of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  5. Debra Tucker v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API