Patrick Lasley v. Comm'r of Social Security
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COOK, Circuit Judge.
Mark Naegel, counsel for a prevailing social security disability benefits applicant, appeals the district court’s order awarding significantly reduced attorneys’ fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). He argues that the court should have approved his request for $26,049.73 — the 25-percent contingency fee accepted by his client and permitted by statute. The Commissioner of Social Security, representing the interests of the claimant whose benefits pay for the fees, see Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 798 n. 6, 122 S.Ct. 1817, 152 L.Ed.2d 996 (2002) (acknowledging the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Dale Wells, William Hlywa v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Appeal of John S. HoggCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Rodriquez v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Edna L. HAYES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Johnny E. DAMRON, Plaintiff-Appellant, James Roy Williams, Attorney-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
3Cited by125 opinions
- Christian Arnold v. Martin J. O'MalleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
- Ringel v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018
- Debra Tucker v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
- Sykes v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
- Jason Kertz v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.