Legal Opinion
Rudolph v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided September 29, 1986No. 85-5722PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
800 F.2d 1040
55 USLW 2264, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,934
Sidney J. RUDOLPH, individually and on Behalf of all other
persons similarly situated, and Joseph D. Decosimo, Trustee
in Liquidation of the DeLorean Research Limited Partnership,
a Michigan Limited Partnership, Plaintiffs- Appellants,
v.
ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO., an Illinois partnership, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 85-5722.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
Sept. 29, 1986.
Murray Sams, Jr., Peter J. Yanowitch, Frank D. Newman, Sams, Ward, P.A., Miami, Fla., Sidney Davis, Davis, Markel & Edwards, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellants.
Marti…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Rubinstein v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Abbott v. Equity Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Digital Properties, Inc. v. City of PlantationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Levine v. Diamanthuset, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- W.O. Akin v. Q-L Investments, Inc., Etc., Laventhol & HorwathCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.