Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Peterson

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1892PublishedCited by 7 opinions

JError to the County Court of Parle County.

1Opinion of the CourtBissell, J.

In 1888, A. Bergh was an owner in certain mining claims in the Platte mining district, Park county, Colorado, called the “ Colorado No. 1 ” and “ Colorado No. 2.” A. H. Estes had some interest in these claims, but the exact extent of it is not apparent from the record. In November, Estes and Bergh made a contract with Perkins, Hart & Co., to transfer to them eleven twenty-fifths of these two properties, for which the grantees were to expend a sum not exceeding 14,000 for the development of the claims. On the 1 Ofcli, eleven twenty-fifths of the two properties were deeded to Perkins, Shreve…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sturm v. UlrichCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  2. Lyman v. SchwartzColorado Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Meister v. FarrowMontana Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Frontier Exploration, Inc. v. Blocker Exploration Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Zimmerman v. Denver Consolidated Tramway Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API