Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Coryell

Dauphin County Court of Quarter Sessions

Decided July 13, 1936No. 63Published

1Opinion of the Court

WiCKERSHAM, J.,

The indictment, returned by the grand jury charges that defendant did “unlawfully . . . engage in the practice of architecture in the State of Pennsylvania, County of Dauphin, by then and there preparing plans for buildings and superintending their construction, some of said plans being issued without title and some of said plans carrying the title of designer”; also that he “did unlawfully, wilfully, knowingly and maliciously hold himself forth as an architect. 77

The case was tried by the court without a jury and testimony was taken stenographically, after which we *417ordered the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. MeggsSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
  2. Van Pelt v. HilliardSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
  3. State Board of Examiners for Architects & Engineers v. RodgersTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Simons, Brittain & English, Inc. v. Armstrong & MarkellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Dawson v. ShawSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API