Legal Opinion

Van Reken v. Darden, Neef & Heitsch

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 2004No. Docket 240478PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJansen, J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right from a circuit court order granting defendants’ motion for reconsideration and denying plaintiff’s motion for summary disposition. We reverse and remand.

Fohowing a jury verdict, a judgment in the amount of $115,691.96 was entered on March 7, 1991, in favor of plaintiff, who, apparently, sued defendants for legal malpractice. An amended “final judgment” was entered on July 29, 1991. Defendants paid no part of the judgment amount, and on February 28, 2001, Oakland Circuit Judge Gene Schnelz 3 granted an ex parte motion, extending the previous judgment in favor of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sun Valley Foods Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Pohutski v. City of Allen ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Eggleston v. Bio-Medical Applications of Detroit, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  4. CAM Construction v. Lake Edgewood Condominium Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Federated Publications, Inc v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Truel v. City of DearbornMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Stark v. Fifarek (In re Fifarek)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2007
  3. Trentadue v. Buckler Automatic Lawn Sprinkler Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Borgess Medical Center v. RestoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Koivisto v. DavisMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API