Vermont Fruit Co. v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Vermont
Assumpsit. Heard on the report of a commission npon the question of the right of the claimant to the funds in the hands of the trustee at the September Term, 1916, Chittenden County, Waterman J., presiding. Judgment for the claimant. Plaintiff excepted. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the CourtMiles, J.
This is an action of contract, commenced by trustee process, in which the Farmers’ Union Bank is claimant, and the controversy arises between the plaintiff and the claimant over the fund trusteed. The case was referred to a commissioner upon whose report and finding of facts the judgment below was rendered for the claimant. Exceptions to this judgment and to rulings of the court on trial were taken by the plaintiff; but only two of those exceptions have been briefed and we confine our consideration to the exceptions briefed.
From the commissioner’s report and the files and records of the court…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. HowardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
- Clark's Admr. v. Wilmington Savings BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
- Crane v. ThayerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1846
- Barron v. PettesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1846
- E. & T. Fairbanks & Co. v. KittredgeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1850
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Libercent v. AldrichSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
- Brennen v. Mogul Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Lamoureux v. Chromalloy Farm Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- DuCommun v. KijakaziDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2020