Legal Opinion
Otis Elevator Co. v. United Technologies Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 29, 1975No. 75 Civ. 5150PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PIERCE, District Judge.
OPINION AND ORDER
On October 20, 1975, this Court signed an order directing the defendant, United Technologies Corporation (“United”), to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue against the furtherance of United’s October 15, 1975 cash tender offer for not less than 2.5 and up to 4.5 million shares of the common stock of plaintiff Otis Elevator Company (“Otis”). The motion for an injunction, brought on by Otis on the basis of its first cause in an action commenced against United, charged that the outstanding tender offer was in violation of § 14(d) & (e)…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hamilton Watch Co. v. Benrus Watch Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,041 Sonesta International Hotels Corporation v. Wellington AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Gustave Gerstle, (Cross-Appellants) v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc., (Cross-Appellee)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Missouri Portland Cement Company, Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee v. Cargill, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellee-Appellant, and the First BostoncorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- Gulf & Western Industries, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,877 Seaboard World Airlines, Inc. v. Tiger International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Merrit v. Libby, McNeill & LibbyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EdelmanDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1987
- Trane Co. v. O'Connor SecuritiesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Crouse-Hinds Co. v. Internorth, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.