Legal Opinion

Berry v. Burdman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1980No. 45275PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

This is a class action, the certified class being:

[a]ll former, present and future AFDC recipients in the State of Washington whose public assistance benefits have been, are being, or may be reduced and who have been, are being or may be required to have the remaining portion of the family's AFDC grant paid to a protective payee, because of their failure to turn over support payments to the Office of Support Enforcement, Department of Social and Health Services, including those recipients who have or may sign agreements promising to repay to the Office of Support Enforcement the amount of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Townsend v. SwankSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Burns v. AlcalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Carleson v. RemillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Whitehead v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. West v. FrenchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. Jackman v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  3. HTP Inc v. First Merit Group Holdings IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
  4. Jacquins v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  5. Rekhter v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API