Legal Opinion
Consolidated Edison Co. v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 25, 1989No. 88 Civ. 3748 (LLS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
STANTON, District Judge.
Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and (6). The motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (“Con Ed”) owns and operates Indian Point Unit No. 2 Nuclear Generating Station (“Indian Point”), Ravenswood Generating Station (“Ravens-wood”), and Arthur Kill Generating Station (“Arthur Kill”). Defendant New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (“DEC”) is a state agency responsible for carrying out the state’s environmental policy. N.Y. Envtl. Conserv. Law (“ECL”) §…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Municipal Authority of the Borough of St. Marys v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States v. New York City Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- United States v. New York City Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995