Legal Opinion
Municipal Authority of the Borough of St. Marys v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 7, 1991No. 91-3009PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Circuit Judge.
St. Marys petitions this court for review of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (“EPA”) decision to approve an individual control strategy issued by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources for the St. Mary’s Publicly Owned Treatment Works, and also the EPA’s decision to include Elk Creek on the list of polluted navigable waters subject to the requirements of the Clean Water Act’s § 304(1) program. 33 U.S.C. § 1314(1). Because such actions do not constitute promulgation of an individual control strategy by the EPA…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Environmental Protection Agency v. California Ex Rel. State Water Resources Control BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. TrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Crown Simpson Pulp Co. v. CostleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- District of Columbia, a Municipal Corporation v. Jack J. Schramm, Regional Administrator, Region Iii, U. S. EpaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hecla Mining Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency Thomas P. Dunne, Administrator, Region 10, EpaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Save Our Bays & Beaches v. City & County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1994
- Lake Cumberland Trust, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Lake Cumberland Trust, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992