Legal Opinion

Brooklyn Properties v. Shade

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 4, 2004Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Appeal from the order dated November 7, 2002 unanimously dismissed as superseded.

Order dated November 12, 2002 (M. Pinckney, J.) insofar as appealed from unanimously modified by vacating the provision which in effect denied tenant’s application to vacate the default final judgment and to be restored to possession on the ground of excusable default and the alleged meritorious defenses of laches and breach of the warranty of habitability, and by providing that tenant’s application on said grounds is remanded for determination after a hearing; as so modified,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. 96 Pierrepont, LLC v. MauroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. De La Barrera v. HandlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Ananda Capital Partners, Inc. v. Stav Electrical Systems (1994) Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Haberman v. SimonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API