Legal Opinion
Ball Bearing Co. v. Star Ball Retainer Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
Decided August 2, 1906No. 28PublishedCited by 2 opinions
In Equity. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, District Judge.
This suit is brought for the purpose of restraining the defendant from an alleged infringement of two patents, Nos. 419,968 and 449,959, issued to George F. Simonds April *7227, 1891, for improvements in ball bearings. They relate to bearings in which spherical rollers or balls are employed to dimmish friction. The first, No. 449,968, relates to that class of ball bearings in xvhich spherical rollers or balls are employed to resist end pressure or thrust, and the second, No. 449;959, to that class of ball bearings in which rollers or balls are employed with free lateral…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. CramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Boyd v. Janesville Hay Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Fay v. MasonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
3Cited by2 opinions
- Miller Pasteurizing Mach. Co. v. RichDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1914
- Ball Bearing Co. v. Star Ball Retainer Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1906